Materials and Processing Technology webcasts

Webcasts on aspects of Materials and Processing Technology standards identified during external moderation

Video transcript

Kia ora and welcome.

This webcast is intended to provide guidance and advice on the requirements for the Level 1 Materials and Processing Technology standard 92013.

Specifically, this webcast will unpack the requirements to ‘explore’ and ‘investigate’ the performance properties of different materials.
Let's have a look at what the standard requires.

To Achieve, students will physically explore the properties of more than one material using the experimental methods in Explanatory Note 3 of the standard.

For Merit and above, students will investigate the properties of different materials through ongoing experimentation using methods of transforming, combining, manipulating or forming.

The expressions ‘explore’ and ‘investigate’ relate to the depth of the experimentation.

The standard does require that 2 or more materials must be used to explore or discover 2 or more performance properties.

So what would exploration look like? 

The student has physically transformed, combined, manipulated and/or formed the materials, observed the way the materials perform and then made a decision on which material to select for their purposeful outcome.

The experiment is likely a single test or trial.

So what is the distinction between exploration and investigation?

A key to this criterion is continuous experimentation with materials to understand more about their performance properties.

The exploration has to be more than one time study, and must show evidence of an iterative cycle of experimentation, analysis and refinement. This means that the student’s understanding of material performance properties is strengthened or deepened as they undertake further physical experiments using, again, the methods from Explanatory Note 3.

So what is not considered evidence of exploration or investigation?

  • While research can support experiments, evidence must demonstrate physical, hands-on experimentation.
  • Although students may use simulations to experiment with different materials, this alone does not qualify as exploration or investigation.
  • Experiments that do not use the methods from Explanatory Note 3 are not considered exploration or investigation.
  • Evidence where the student has used the methods from Explanatory Note 3, but not observed performance properties, will not attain the standard.
  • Remember, the intent of the standard is for students to deeply explore and make deliberate choices regarding the selection of performance properties and materials. Unrelated multiple experiments do not count as investigation.

For more explanation and examples of what is required for this aspect, see the Materials and Processing Technology National Moderator Report and exemplars on the NZQA website.  

There are also annotated samples of student evidence on the Assessor Practice Tool for 92013. These show the different ways in which this aspect can be met.

Further assessor support for the internal Achievement Standards in Materials and Processing Technology can be found on our assessor support catalogue available on the NZQA website.  

Thank you.  

Explore versus investigate (3:49 mins)

Guidance and advice on the requirements of standard 92013 to ‘explore’ and ‘investigate’ the performance properties of different materials

Video transcript

Kia ora and welcome.  

This webcast is intended to provide guidance and advice on the requirements for Level 1 Materials and Processing Technology standard 92013. 

Specifically, this webcast will unpack the achievement criteria for a grade of Excellence. 

The first criterion for Excellence requires the student to have analysed the properties of different materials. So, what might this look like? 

At Merit, students will have undertaken continuous study of materials to strengthen or deepen their understanding of their properties, including how they perform when combined, manipulated, transformed, or formed. 

The evidence would likely reveal students have examined the similarities or differences in how the materials perform, and Excellence is reached when students interpret the significance of the results of those experiments in relation to the materials and how to use them. This is evidence of analysis. 

Remember, the evidence must focus on the properties of materials, and it is stated in the unpacking; this should include performance properties. The student must also be using methods from Explanatory Note 3 to explore those properties. 

The second criterion for Excellence requires students to justify their use of materials in the purposeful outcome. The justification is an explanation of their choice of material and how it will be used, with reasoning, and to give reasons there must be evidence of analysis. That evidence will likely have been gathered during the ongoing experimentation and could also be supported with the findings from research. This means the analysis informs justification. 

The analysis of how the materials perform is what provides the facts or observations that the justification uses, and at Excellence the analysis strengthens the credibility of the justification by showing the student’s decisions are based on fact, not opinion. 

So, what is not considered evidence of analysis? An analysis is not a description; it is the examination of content to reveal deeper meaning.

Evidence of analysis and justification should not be based on personal opinion. Personal opinion might be included, but should be supported by reasoning.

For this standard, the analysis must target the properties of the different materials, and any evidence of analysis of other aspects of technological practice would not inform a grade of Excellence. 

This also applies to the evidence of justification; the standard specifically asks for justification of the use of materials, not justification of other decisions made during development. To justify a choice of materials there must be evidence of reasoning. 

The evidence must back up the student’s decision. This could be seen throughout the folio or in a final evaluation. The student needs to show evidence of what informed their decision to use a material. A justification should be as specific as possible and explain why one material is better, or how the decision made is the best one for the outcome. Photographs should be used to support the justification. 

For additional explanation and examples of what is required for this aspect of the Standard, see the exemplars and National Moderator Report on the Materials and Processing Technology Subject page in the NZQA website. 

Further assessor support for this Level 1 Materials and Processing Technology internal Achievement Standard is also available on Pūtake, NZQA’s learning management system.

Thank you. 

92013 Requirements for Excellence (4:01 mins)

This video unpacks the achievement criteria for a grade of Excellence.

Video transcript

Kia ora and welcome. This webcast is intended to provide guidance and advice on the requirements for Level 1 Materials and Processing Technology standard 92013.

Specifically, this webcast will unpack Explanatory Note 3.

The title of the standard is, "Experiment with different materials to develop a Materials and Processing Technology outcome."

Explanatory Note 3 of the standard refers to experimentation as ‘trying out new ideas or methods for the purpose of discovery.’ To attain the standard, the actions or methods of transforming, combining, manipulating, or forming materials must be seen in the evidence.

One or more of these actions or methods are required.

Let's unpack the actions and methods listed in Explanatory Note 3.

Transforming involves experimenting with materials in ways that change their physical structure without changing their chemical composition.

Combining materials refers to incorporating at least one material with another during experimentation. Two or more materials would be united, connected, or linked, and therefore used together.

Manipulating involves experimenting with materials in ways that do not change their composition and structure. Manipulative methods are the actions most commonly seen when developing technological products.

Forming requires experiments with different materials to create an entirely new material, one that has a different chemical composition or structure.

Assessors must remember that the purpose of the experiments is to explore the performance properties of different materials.

When addressing Explanatory Note 3, it is worth considering that the exploration of performance properties must involve physical experiments, but not all hands-on experiments fit in the categories of Explanatory Note 3.

For example, burning or stretching a fabric, breaking or hitting timber, washing, soaking, or weathering materials.
These actions on their own will likely verify material performance properties, but if an experiment cannot be categorized as transforming, combining, manipulating, or forming, it does not contribute to meeting the standard.

Also remember that research and/or simulations that explore performance properties do not on their own contribute to attainment of the standard. And lastly, it's essential that the evidence gathered from the experiments does not focus on the students’ selection and use of equipment and tools. The standard's intention is not to emphasise these aspects. Instead, the focus should be on exploring ideas or methods to understand how a material performs when transformed, combined, manipulated, or formed.

Techniques, tools, and equipment are simply means to facilitate these discoveries.

For additional explanation and examples of what is required for this aspect of the standard, see the exemplars and the National Moderator Report on the Materials and Processing Technology subject page on the NZQA website.

Further assessor support for this Level 1 Materials and Processing Technology internal Achievement Standard is also available on Pūtake, NZQA's learning management system.

Thank you.

92013 – Understanding Explanatory Note 3 (3:20 mins)

This video looks at what experimentation means in Explanatory Note 3 and some examples of experimentation.

Find more Materials and Processing Technology resources on the subject page