US 13363 Annotated exemplars

This annotated exemplar is intended for teacher use only. Annotated exemplars are extracts of student evidence, with commentary, that explain key parts of a standard. These help teachers make assessment judgements at the grade boundaries.

TKI Māori Performing Arts assessment resources (external link)

Download all exemplars and commentary [PDF, 445 KB]

For Kairangi, the ākonga needs to demonstrate:

• comprehensive knowledge of waiata ā-ringa (Outcome 1)
• the essential skills of waiata ā-ringa with artistic expression (Outcome 2).

For Outcome 1, this involves:

• a description of five different categories of waiata ā-ringa, linking the purpose and context of waiata ā-ringa from each category: Evidence Requirement (ER) 1.1
• a description of two waiata ā-ringa in terms of tikanga (meaning, values, and Māori world view) and pūtake (composer, their iwi, when and why the waiata was composed, intended performance style), and identifying personal influences that led to the development of the waiata ā-ringa composition: ER1.2.

The response includes a comprehensive description of one category of waiata (1) and links the purpose and context of the waiata ā-ringa (2) (ER1.1).

The response also includes a comprehensive description of one category of waiata ā-ringa in terms of tikanga (3) and pūtake (4), and identifies personal influences that led to the development of the waiata ā-ringa composition (5) (ER1.2).

For Kaiaka, the ākonga needs to demonstrate:

• in-depth knowledge of waiata ā-ringa (Outcome 1)
• the essential skills of waiata ā-ringa with purpose (Outcome 2).

For Outcome 1, this involves:

• a description of five different categories of waiata ā-ringa and an example of waiata ā-ringa from each category: Evidence Requirement (ER) 1.1
• a description of two waiata ā-ringa in terms of tikanga (meaning, values, and Māori world view) and pūtake (composer, their iwi, when and why the waiata was composed, intended performance style), and identifying the performance and composition style specific to each waiata ā-ringa: ER1.2.

The response includes an in-depth description of one category of waiata (1) as well as an example of a waiata ā-ringa from the same category (2) (ER1.1).

The response also includes an in-depth description of one category of waiata in terms of tikanga (3) and pūtake (4) and identifies the performance and composition style of the waiata (5) (ER1.2).

For Paetae, the ākonga needs to demonstrate:

• knowledge of waiata ā-ringa (Outcome 1);
• the essential skills of waiata ā-ringa (Outcome 2).

For Outcome 1, this involves:

• a description of five categories of waiata ā-ringa: Evidence Requirement (ER) 1.1
• a description of two waiata ā-ringa in terms of tikanga (meaning, values, and Māori world view) and pūtake (composer, their iwi, when and why the waiata was composed, intended performance style): ER1.2.

The response includes a description of one category of waiata (1) (ER1.1) as well as a description of a waiata ā-ringa in terms of tikanga (2) and pūtake (3) (ER1.2).

The assessor is encouraged to ensure ākonga have used the composer’s original work/version. However, a variant of the original work may be acceptable where it accords with iwi or hapū tradition. This is intended to preserve the integrity of the waiata ā-ringa and the knowledge within it.