Clarification details
Updated December 2017. The ‘relevance of identified risks’ section has been updated to address issues in moderation.
Selection of a challenging outdoor activity
The context for this standard should be a challenging outdoor activity where a student is required to demonstrate personal competence in a risky situation. Refer to Explanatory Note 6 to see what these may include.
Personal application of risk management strategies
Risk management strategies must be applied by the student as they relate to the challenging outdoor activity.
Relevance of identified risks
The risks selected by the student/teacher should be relevant and meaningful to the challenging outdoor activity.
The submission of RAMS, SAPs and SOPs forms can be used as planning tools, and be used to identify the relevant risks.
For Merit and Excellence, student responses must explain in detail/evaluate how and why the risk management strategies are relevant to the identified risk(s). This should include evidence that the most relevant strategies have been applied and explained in relation to the activity.
Analysing risk management strategies
Student responses must provide an explanation that includes:
- a clearly identified risk
- what the risk management strategy is
- how and why each risk management strategy is applied
- specific examples of how each strategy is applied.
The analysis of each risk management strategy should include what happens before, during and after the activity.
Analyse comprehensively
Student responses must provide an evaluation which may consider the following:
- the risk management strategies applied that were most relevant to the identified risk
- justifing why with supporting evidence from own personal experiences
- positives and negatives
- concluding which strategies worked best and why
- future suggestions/modifications to the application of risk management strategies.